menuclose
StockBrokers.com is committed to the highest ethical standards and reviews services independently. Learn how we make money.

Interactive Brokers vs TradeStation 2026

Jessica Inskip

Written by Jessica Inskip
Director of Investor Research

Jeff Anberg

Edited by Jeff Anberg
Senior Editor

Blain Reinkensmeyer

Reviewed by Blain Reinkensmeyer
Managing Partner

June 30, 2026
  Fact Checked
close
Jessica Inskip Jessica Inskip
Director of Investor Research

Jessica Inskip is Director of Investor Research at StockBrokers.com, bringing 15 years of experience in brokerage and trading strategy. Jessica focuses on investor education and brokerage industry research.

stockbrokers-com-favicon.ico Why you can trust us

Led by Jessica Inskip, Director of Investor Research, the StockBrokers.com research team collects thousands of data points across hundreds of variables. We evaluate features important to every kind of investor, including beginners, casual investors, passive investors, and active traders. We carefully track data on margin rates, trading costs, and fees to rate stock brokers across our proprietary testing categories.

Our researchers open personal brokerage accounts and test all available platforms on desktop, web, and mobile for each broker reviewed on StockBrokers.com. Learn more about how we test.

Interactive Brokers vs TradeStation is a matchup of two platforms serious traders respect, and the right answer depends on what you trade and how.

Interactive Brokers is the broader and cheaper of the two, and the better pick for most. It has the lowest margin at a flat 6.83%, reaches 36 international markets, and carries deeper research and education. But TradeStation has a loyal following for a reason, built on the deepest charting here and EasyLanguage, its strategy-automation language. Interactive Brokers is the all-around active broker. TradeStation is the systematic trader's tool.

Interactive Brokers vs TradeStation

Broker
Rating
"Best for"
Bullet Points
Overall Score
5.0/5
Best for professionals, international trading
  • Minimum Deposit: $0.00
  • Stock Trades: $0.00
  • Options (Per Contract): $0.65 info
Why we like it
Review

Interactive Brokers is a go-to choice for professionals because of its institutional-grade desktop trading platform, high-quality trade executions and low margin rates. Read full review

Pros
  • 170+ markets to trade.
  • IBKR Desktop platform has institutional power and intuitive usability.
  • Industry-leading margin rates and competitive interest yields.
Cons
  • Density of features requires a significant time investment.
  • Educational content skips over the basics for true beginners.
  • Certain tools lack the curated context needed.
Overall Score
3.5/5
Innovative platform technology
  • Minimum Deposit: $0.00
  • Stock Trades: $0.00
  • Options (Per Contract): $0.80 info
Why we like it
Review

TradeStation is a brokerage best known for its highly customizable trading platforms, advanced options and futures capabilities, and powerful tools designed for active and experienced traders. Read full review

Pros
  • New TITAN X platform.
  • Tools for futures and options.
  • "Why is it Moving?" and "Hot Lists" tools on price action.
Cons
  • Not a good choice for beginners or casual investors.
  • Annual IRA maintenance fees and steep option exercise charges.
  • No spot cryptocurrency trading, fractional shares, or robo-advisory services.

TradeStation vs Interactive Brokers at a glance

Our testing found two capable active trading platforms with a clear gap in breadth. Interactive Brokers wins on range, cost, research, and global access. TradeStation answers with deep charting, strategy automation, and a modern new platform in TITAN X. The table shows where each one lands.

Feature Interactive Brokers logoInteractive Brokers
TradeStation logoTradeStation
Overall 5/5 Stars 3.5/5 Stars
Mobile Trading Apps 5/5 Stars 4/5 Stars
Advanced Trading 4.5/5 Stars 4/5 Stars
Minimum Deposit $0.00 $0.00
Stock Trades $0.00 $0.00
Options (Per Contract) $0.65 $0.80
Futures Trading Yes Yes
Crypto Trading Yes No

Top takeaways for Interactive Brokers in 2026

  • It has the lowest margin in this matchup, a flat 6.83% at every balance against TradeStation's 12.5% on smaller accounts.
  • The range is far wider, with 36 international markets, crypto, forex, and bonds that TradeStation doesn't offer.
  • Trader Workstation is a professional-grade platform with net Greeks, algos, and portfolio risk tools.
  • The research and education run deeper, with hundreds of courses on IBKR Campus.
  • It's friendlier on fees, with $0 account transfers and no IRA fees.

Top takeaways for TradeStation in 2026

  • Its charting is deeper, with 294 indicators to Interactive Brokers' 155.
  • EasyLanguage lets you code, backtest, and automate your own strategies, a real draw for systematic traders.
  • TITAN X is a clean, modern platform with a redesigned options chain and net Greeks on the ticket.
  • TradeStation MCP connects the platform to Claude for AI-assisted trading, which is new this year.
  • The ancillary costs add up, with a $35 IRA fee, and $125 account transfers, and there's no crypto, forex, or international access. Some pricing is also tiered, making it more expensive for less active traders, such as the $0.80 per-contract options fee that scales all the way down to $0 if you trade more than 10,000 contracts.

TradeStation vs Interactive Brokers: fees and commissions

Both brokers trade stocks for $0, so the real gaps are margin, the surcharges around options, and the account fees you only meet at the edges. We verified the pricing below.

Feature Interactive Brokers logoInteractive Brokers
TradeStation logoTradeStation
Stock Trades $0.00 $0.00
Mutual Fund Trade Fee $14.95 $14.95
Options (Per Contract) $0.65 $0.80
Options Exercise Fee $0.00 $14.95
Options Assignment Fee $0.00 $5.95
Futures (Per Contract) $0.85 $1.75
Broker Assisted Trade Fee Varies $25
Margin Rate Under $25,000 6.83% 11.75%
Bond Trade Fee Varies $14.95 + $5 per bond
IRA Annual Fee $0.00 $35.00
Account Transfer Out (Full) $0.00 $125.00

Where Interactive Brokers wins on cost

Interactive Brokers is cheaper almost everywhere it counts. Its margin is a flat 6.83% at every balance, where TradeStation starts at 12.5% and only reaches 7.5% above $500,000. Options run $0.65 a contract with free exercise and assignment, against TradeStation's $0.80 for the base-tier plus a $14.95 exercise and $5.95 assignment fee. That commission does scale all the way down to $0 per contract, the more that you trade. IBKR also charges nothing to transfer an account out or hold an IRA, where TradeStation charges $125 to transfer and a $35 annual IRA fee.

Where TradeStation wins on cost

TradeStation's pricing is built for the high-volume active trader rather than the buy-and-hold investor. Its margin falls to 7.5% at higher balances, options contracts are zero-commission if you trade more than 10,000, and it offers order-liquidity rebates that can offset costs for traders who add volume to the market. For a high-balance trader who routes a lot of flow, the gap with IBKR narrows.

Verdict

Best for low costs across the board: Interactive Brokers.

Best for high-volume traders who capture rebates: TradeStation.

For nearly everyone, Interactive Brokers is the cheaper broker on margin, options, and account fees alike. TradeStation only closes the gap for a high-balance, high-volume trader.

Interactive Brokers vs TradeStation: range of investments

Both cover the active trading core of stocks, ETFs, options, and futures. The difference is everything around that core, where Interactive Brokers reaches far beyond what TradeStation offers.

Feature Interactive Brokers logoInteractive Brokers
TradeStation logoTradeStation
Options Trading Yes Yes
Fractional Shares (Stocks) Yes No
Fractional Shares (ETFs) Yes No
Mutual Funds Yes Yes
Fixed Income (Treasurys) Yes No
Fixed Income (Corporate Bonds) Yes No
Fixed Income (Municipal Bonds) Yes No
Crypto Trading Yes No
Crypto Trading - Total Coins 11 0
Futures Trading Yes Yes
Futures Options Yes Yes
Forex Trading Yes No
Prediction markets Yes No
IPO Access No No
Order Type - After Hours Yes Yes
Order Type - 24 hr Extended Yes No
Order Type - Broker Assisted Yes Yes

Where Interactive Brokers wins

Interactive Brokers trades almost anything, almost anywhere. It reaches 36 international markets, adds crypto, forex, and a full bond desk, and offers fractional shares that TradeStation doesn't. For a trader who wants global reach or any asset class beyond US stocks, options, and futures, IBKR is the only one of the two that delivers.

Where TradeStation wins

TradeStation keeps a tight focus on the active trader essentials, and serves them well. It covers stocks, ETFs, options, futures, and futures options, the assets most US-based active and systematic traders actually use, plus the core IRAs and entity accounts. If your trading lives entirely in those products, the narrower lineup will serve you just fine.

Verdict

Best for breadth and global access: Interactive Brokers.

Best for a focused US active trading core: TradeStation.

If you want crypto, forex, international markets, or bonds, only Interactive Brokers offers them. TradeStation fits the trader whose world is US stocks, options, and futures and nothing else.

Feature Interactive Brokers logoInteractive Brokers
TradeStation logoTradeStation
Range of Investments 5/5 Stars 4/5 Stars

Featured Offers


TradeStation vs Interactive Brokers: mobile apps

Both apps are built for traders, and they split on depth versus simplicity. Interactive Brokers packs professional tools into its flagship app. TradeStation keeps its app clean and fast. Our testing compared charting, order entry, and market data on each.

Feature Interactive Brokers logoInteractive Brokers
TradeStation logoTradeStation
iPhone App Yes Yes
Android App Yes Yes
Apple Watch App Yes No
Stock Alerts Yes Yes
Mobile Watchlists - Column Customization Yes Yes
Mobile Watchlists - Create & Manage Yes Yes
Mobile Watchlists - Column Filtering Yes Yes

Where TradeStation's app wins

TradeStation's app is the easier one to move around. Charting is a highlight, with drawings that snap to exact prices and a single tap to add several moving averages at once. The "why is it moving" explainer from Benzinga gives a quick, plain read on any price move. For a trader who wants a fast price pulse and a clean trade ticket, it gets out of the way.

Mobile app detailed quote of GOOGL highlighting the why is this moving? section

TradeStation’s mobile app adds real context to market moves with its “Why Is It Moving?” feature, shown here for GOOGL. Instead of just seeing the price, you get quick, relevant insights explaining what's driving the action, whether it’s earnings, analyst calls, or broader news. It’s a powerful way to stay informed without digging through headlines.

Where Interactive Brokers's app wins

Interactive Brokers puts professional tools on a phone, which is why it took our #1 mobile honors. Its options chain leads with options statistics and implied-volatility data, the connections feature surfaces related products and trade ideas, and the order ticket carries conditional orders and algos most apps don't attempt. An AI news overview sums up what's moving a stock in a few lines. For research and serious order entry on the go, it goes deeper.

IBKR mobile platform toolbox

Interactive Brokers’ flagship mobile app puts professional-grade tools at your fingertips with its fully-loaded Toolbox feature. Investors can access AI-powered trade ideas, options strategies, tax optimization tools, auto-investing, crypto trading, and market scanners, all in one place. This mobile experience makes it easy to manage sophisticated strategies on the go, rivaling many desktop platforms.

Verdict

Best for depth and research on the go: Interactive Brokers.

Best for clean charting and a fast trade: TradeStation.

Interactive Brokers is the more capable mobile app. TradeStation is the more approachable one for charting and quick trades.

Feature Interactive Brokers logoInteractive Brokers
TradeStation logoTradeStation
Mobile Trading Apps 5/5 Stars 4/5 Stars

TradeStation vs Interactive Brokers: trading platforms and tools

This is the heart of the matchup, since both are serious active trading platforms. TradeStation offers TITAN X, its modern new flagship. Interactive Brokers offers Trader Workstation plus the friendlier IBKR Desktop. The split is charting and strategy automation against professional breadth.

Feature Interactive Brokers logoInteractive Brokers
TradeStation logoTradeStation
Active Trading Platform IBKR Desktop and Trader Workstation (TWS) TITAN X
Desktop Trading Platform Yes Yes
Web Trading Platform Yes Yes
Desktop Platform (Mac) Yes Yes
Paper Trading Yes Yes
Watchlists - Total Fields 659 341
Charting - Indicators / Studies 155 294
Charting - Drawing Tools 85 45
Charting - Adjust Trades on Chart Yes Yes
Charting - Custom Studies No Yes
Ladder Trading Yes Yes
Level 2 Quotes - Stocks Yes Yes
Trade Hot Keys Yes Yes
Trade Ticket - Margin Impact Yes No
Trade Ticket - Tax Lot Selection Yes Yes

Where TradeStation wins

TradeStation is where the systematic trader feels at home. Its charting goes deeper than IBKR's, with 294 indicators to 155 and twice the study customizations, and TITAN X gives it a clean, modern interface with a redesigned options chain and net Greeks on the ticket. The real differentiator is EasyLanguage, TradeStation's coding language for building, backtesting, and automating your own strategies, which has earned it a loyal following among systematic traders for decades.

TradeStation TITAN X desktop trading platform

TradeStation's TITAN X Sector View displays the indices for all 11 GICS sectors in a predefined layout. On the right, the trade ticket shows a quote, applicable buying power, and advanced trade settings for SPY.

Where Interactive Brokers wins

Interactive Brokers brings more professional firepower overall. Trader Workstation pairs net Greeks with a one-click delta-neutral builder, full algorithmic order types, a risk navigator, and a watchlist with 659 fields to TradeStation's 341. It also offers paper trading and advanced backtesting through ORATS, and IBKR Desktop gives newer active traders a less overwhelming way in. For sheer breadth of professional tools, TWS is the deeper machine.

IBKR Desktop

Interactive Brokers’ MultiSort Screener takes stock screening to the next level by letting users assign custom weightings to each selection criteria. Beyond traditional filters like P/E ratio or dividend yield, investors can prioritize what matters most, whether it’s earnings growth, valuation, or analyst ratings. This advanced screening tool helps surface results that truly match your personal investment strategy.

Verdict

Best for professional breadth and risk tools: Interactive Brokers.

Best for charting and strategy automation: TradeStation.

Both are excellent platforms. IBKR is the deeper all-around toolkit, and TradeStation is the one for a trader who codes and automates strategies in EasyLanguage.

Feature Interactive Brokers logoInteractive Brokers
TradeStation logoTradeStation
Advanced Trading 4.5/5 Stars 4/5 Stars

Interactive Brokers vs TradeStation: research

This is the widest gap on the page. Interactive Brokers runs one of the deeper research desks I test, while TradeStation keeps research lean and technical. We checked both feature by feature below.

Feature Interactive Brokers logoInteractive Brokers
TradeStation logoTradeStation
Research - Stocks Yes Yes
Screener - Stocks Yes Yes
Research - ETFs Yes Yes
Screener - ETFs Yes Yes
Research - Mutual Funds Yes No
Screener - Mutual Funds Yes No
Research - Fixed Income Yes No
Screener - Fixed Income Yes No
Research - Pink Sheets / OTCBB Yes Yes
Options Chains - IV Yes Yes
Option Chains - Total Greeks 5 5
Strategy Net Greeks Yes Yes
Options - Strategy Builder Yes Yes

Where Interactive Brokers wins

Interactive Brokers has far more to work with. It carries the widest set of third-party research providers I've tested, a full bond scanner, deep fundamentals on every quote, and a multi-sort screener that lets you weight the factors that matter most. Its connections tool ties any stock to related products, themes, and trade ideas. For data depth and screening, it isn't close.

Interactive Brokers Connections research tool

Interactive Brokers’ Connections tab, shown here for NVIDIA (NVDA), gives investors a 360° contextual research view by linking the selected stock to related competitors, thematic sectors like AI infrastructure and data centers, and tradable products such as Forecast Contracts and ETFs. Connections helps traders uncover peers, trends, and broader market relationships beyond just the price quote.

Where TradeStation wins

TradeStation's research is technical and scanner-driven, which suits its audience. Its in-platform scanners run on the same engine as its strategies, so you can hunt for chart patterns and technical setups with real precision, and its daily Insights give a clean read on what moved the market across stocks, options, and futures. What it lacks is the fundamental side, with no fixed income, mutual fund, or economic-calendar research to speak of.

Trader

TradeStation’s Traders Insight blog delivers actionable market commentary from a trader’s point of view, covering a wide range of asset classes and strategies. This post focuses on commodities and even includes screenshots from the TradeStation platform to help visualize the analysis.

Verdict

Best for deep fundamental research and screening: Interactive Brokers.

Best for technical scanning and chart-pattern setups: TradeStation.

Interactive Brokers wins broadly on data and providers. TradeStation's research is narrow but truly useful for the technical trader hunting setups.

Interactive Brokers vs TradeStation: education

Both teach toward serious traders, but they cover very different ground. Interactive Brokers runs one of the broadest libraries I test through its IBKR Campus, with hundreds of courses, many of them CFA-accredited, spanning everything from the basics to advanced macro and fixed income. TradeStation goes narrow and deep, with strong options and technical-analysis Master Classes aimed squarely at advanced traders, but no beginner, retirement, or fundamental content to speak of, and a layout that takes some hunting. One is the place to learn broadly. The other sharpens an already-advanced trader.

Feature Interactive Brokers logoInteractive Brokers
TradeStation logoTradeStation
Education (Stocks) Yes Yes
Education (ETFs) Yes No
Education (Options) Yes Yes
Education (Mutual Funds) Yes No
Education (Fixed Income) Yes No
Videos Yes Yes
Webinars Yes Yes

Verdict

Best for broad learning from the basics up: Interactive Brokers.

Best for advanced options and strategy master classes: TradeStation.

If you want range and a clear path, IBKR Campus is the deeper library. If you're already advanced and want sharp options and technical sessions, TradeStation's Master Classes deliver, as long as you don't mind the layout.

Interactive Brokers and TradeStation: ease of use

Neither platform is built for simplicity, but Interactive Brokers is the easier of the two to settle into, a full star ahead in our testing. Trader Workstation has a steep learning curve, yet its clear labeling makes the climb manageable, and IBKR Desktop gives newer active traders a friendlier middle ground. TradeStation's TITAN X eases onboarding with a launchpad of layout templates and video guides, which is a thoughtful touch for a brand-new platform. The friction shows up elsewhere, since some tools still live on TradeStation's legacy platforms, the mobile trade ticket can be clunky, and applying for options still meant downloading and emailing a form.

Verdict

Best for settling in faster: Interactive Brokers.

Best for guided onboarding to a new platform: TradeStation.

Final thoughts: TradeStation vs Interactive Brokers

For most active traders, Interactive Brokers is the one I'd point to. It took our #1 Active Traders award for good reason, pairing the lowest margin around at a flat 6.83% with 36 international markets, the widest asset range I test, and far deeper research and education. If you trade actively, lean on margin, or want global reach and every asset class in one account, IBKR is the more complete home.

TradeStation earns its place with a specific trader. It took our #1 Innovation award this year for the TradeStation MCP connection with Claude, and its real strength is strategy building, with EasyLanguage coding, deep charting, and a modern platform in TITAN X. If you're a systematic trader who builds, backtests, and automates your own strategies in US stocks, options, and futures, TradeStation is worth it. Most other active traders will get more from Interactive Brokers.

Jessica's take

"Interactive Brokers truly has a solution for almost every type of investor, with a range of investments among the broadest of any broker we cover. TradeStation goes the other way, with an entire platform geared toward the active trader. One does it all. The other is built for one job."

Jessica Inskip
Director of Investor Research

jessica_inskip_170.png

Overall verdict

Best for most active traders: Interactive Brokers.

Best for systematic and strategy-driven traders: TradeStation.

Feature Interactive Brokers logoInteractive Brokers
TradeStation logoTradeStation
Overall 5/5 Stars 3.5/5 Stars
Range of Investments 5/5 Stars 4/5 Stars
Mobile Trading Apps 5/5 Stars 4/5 Stars
Advanced Trading 4.5/5 Stars 4/5 Stars
Research 4.5/5 Stars 2.5/5 Stars
Education 4/5 Stars 2/5 Stars
Ease of Use 4/5 Stars 3/5 Stars

Frequently asked questions

Is Interactive Brokers or TradeStation better for active traders?

Both are built for active trading, so it depends on how you trade. Interactive Brokers is the broader, cheaper choice for most, with lower margin and global access. TradeStation is the pick for systematic traders who code and automate strategies in EasyLanguage. See our guide to the best day trading platforms for more.

Does TradeStation or Interactive Brokers have lower fees?

Interactive Brokers, clearly. Margin is a flat 6.83% against TradeStation's 12.5% on smaller balances, options are cheaper with free exercise and assignment, and IBKR charges nothing to transfer an account out where TradeStation charges $125. TradeStation also adds a $35 annual IRA fee that IBKR doesn't.

Which is better for futures trading, Interactive Brokers or TradeStation?

Both are strong on futures, and it's close. Interactive Brokers is cheaper at $0.85 per contract to TradeStation's $1.75 and took our #1 Futures award. TradeStation counters with deep charting and EasyLanguage automation that systematic futures traders value.

Does TradeStation or Interactive Brokers offer crypto or international markets?

Only Interactive Brokers. It lists 11 cryptocurrencies, trades across 36 international markets, and offers forex. TradeStation offers none of these, keeping its focus on US stocks, options, and futures.

Which has better charting and backtesting?

TradeStation, and it's its signature strength. Its charting carries 294 indicators to Interactive Brokers' 155, and EasyLanguage lets you code, backtest, and automate strategies in a way IBKR doesn't match. IBKR offers solid charting and ORATS backtesting, but TradeStation is the systematic trader's tool.

What is TradeStation MCP, and does Interactive Brokers have it?

TradeStation MCP connects the platform to Claude, so you can use AI to help analyze and trade, the feature behind its #1 Innovation award this year. Interactive Brokers has its own AI tools, like an AI news overview, and has since rolled out its own Claude, ChatGPT, and Grok integrations.

Our testing

Why you should trust us

Jessica Inskip is Director of Investor Research at StockBrokers.com, bringing 15 years of experience in brokerage and trading strategy. A former FINRA-licensed rep, she held Series 7, 63, 66, and 4 licenses. Jessica focuses on investor education and brokerage industry research, appears regularly on CNBC, Bloomberg, The Schwab Network, Fox Business, and Yahoo! Finance, and hosts the Market MakeHer podcast.

Blain Reinkensmeyer, co-founder of StockBrokers.com, has been investing and trading for over 25 years. After having placed over 2,000 trades in his late teens and early 20s, he became one of the first in digital media to review online brokerages. Today, Blain is widely respected as a leading expert on finance and investing, specifically the U.S. online brokerage industry. Blain has been quoted in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, and Fast Company, among others. Blain created the original scoring rubrics for StockBrokers.com and oversees all testing and rating methodologies.

How we tested

  • We used our own brokerage accounts for testing.
  • We collected thousands of data points across the brokers we review.
  • We tested each online broker's website, desktop platforms, and mobile app, where applicable.
  • We maintained strict editorial independence; brokers cannot pay for inclusion or a higher rating.

Our research team meticulously collected data on every feature of importance to a wide range of customer profiles, including beginners, casual investors, passive investors, and active traders. We carefully track variables like margin rates, trading costs, fees, and platform features and use them to help rate brokers across a range of categories measuring ease of use, range of investments, research, education, and more.

At StockBrokers.com, our reviewers use a variety of computing devices to evaluate platforms and tools. Our reviews and data collection were conducted using the following devices chosen to reflect the everyday hardware our readers are likely to be using rather than top-tier configurations: iPhone SE running the latest iOS version, MacBook Pro M1 with 8 GB RAM running the current MacOS, and a Dell Vostro 5402 laptop i5 with 8 GB RAM running Windows 11 Pro.

Each broker was evaluated and scored on over 200 different variables across seven key categories: Range of Investments, Platforms & Tools, Research, Mobile Trading, Education, Ease of Use, and Overall. Learn more about how we test.

Trading platforms tested

We tested 14 online trading platforms for this guide:

Read next

Popular trading guides

More trading guides

Popular broker reviews

About the Editorial Team

Jessica Inskip

Jessica Inskip is Director of Investor Research at StockBrokers.com, bringing 15 years of experience in brokerage and trading strategy. A former FINRA-licensed rep, she held Series 7, 63, 66, and 4 licenses. Jessica focuses on investor education and brokerage industry research, appears regularly on CNBC, Bloomberg, The Schwab Network, Fox Business, and Yahoo! Finance, and hosts the Market MakeHer podcast.

Jeff Anberg

Jeff Anberg is a Senior Editor at StockBrokers.com. Along with years of experience in media distribution at a global newsroom, Jeff has a versatile knowledge base encompassing the technology and financial markets. He is a long-time active investor and engages in research on emerging markets like cryptocurrency. Jeff holds a Bachelor’s Degree in English Literature with a minor in Philosophy from San Francisco State University.

Blain Reinkensmeyer

Blain Reinkensmeyer has 25 years of trading experience with over 2,500 trades placed during that time. He heads research for all U.S.-based brokerages on StockBrokers.com and is respected by executives as the leading expert covering the online broker industry. Blain’s insights have been featured in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Forbes, and the Chicago Tribune, among other media outlets.

close