Charles Schwab vs Public.com 2026
In this head to head comparison of Charles Schwab vs Public.com, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
In this head to head comparison of Charles Schwab vs Public.com, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
For investors comparing account options and available products, Charles Schwab comes out ahead overall on range of investments. Schwab offers stock trading, margin trading, fractional shares, OTC stocks, mutual funds, options, forex, futures, and crypto, plus traditional and Roth IRA accounts and advisor services. Public.com also offers stock trading, margin trading, fractional shares, options, crypto, traditional IRAs, and Roth IRAs, but it does not support OTC stocks, mutual funds, forex, futures, or advisor services. If you want access to a wider mix of investment choices, Charles Schwab is the stronger pick; if you prefer a simpler platform with core investing features and retirement accounts, Public.com still covers the basics.
Both brokers let customers trade stocks, use margin, buy fractional shares, trade options, and invest in crypto, which makes each platform useful for everyday investors. The biggest difference is product depth. Charles Schwab adds OTC stocks, mutual funds, forex, and futures, giving active traders and long-term investors more ways to build a portfolio. Public.com keeps things more focused and does not include those extra market types.
There is also a clear gap in crypto offerings. Charles Schwab offers crypto trading, but only 2 coins, while Public.com offers 66 coins, which may appeal to users looking for a broader crypto selection. That difference shows how the two brokers serve different needs: Schwab is better for overall investing variety, while Public.com stands out more for crypto choice. Based on third-party ratings, Schwab earns 4.5 out of 5 stars for Range of Investments and ranks #3 out of 14 brokers, while Public.com scores 3.5 stars and ranks #12.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Stock Trading | Yes | Yes |
| Account Feature - Margin Trading | Yes | Yes |
| Fractional Shares (Stocks) | Yes | Yes |
| OTC Stocks | Yes | No |
| Mutual Funds | Yes | No |
| Options Trading | Yes | Yes |
| Futures Trading | Yes | No |
| Crypto Trading | Yes | Yes |
| Crypto Trading - Total Coins | 2 | 66 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
Dive deeper: Best Options Trading Platforms & Brokers for 2026, Best Futures Trading Platforms for 2026
Charles Schwab is the clear winner for trading platforms and tools, earning a 4.5-star rating and the #1 spot out of 14 brokers from StockBrokers.com, while Public.com sits at 1 star and ranks #14. Schwab gives active traders and investors far more ways to research, chart, and manage trades, with desktop platforms for both Windows and Mac, paper trading, and a built-in trading journal. For readers who want a fuller set of tools and a more advanced trading experience, Schwab stands out as the stronger choice overall.
When it comes to platform access, both brokers offer a browser-based trading platform, but Schwab also offers downloadable desktop software for Windows and Mac, which Public.com does not. That extra flexibility can matter for traders who prefer a more traditional workstation setup. Schwab also lets users adjust open orders directly on a stock chart, while Public.com does not.
Schwab’s charting and watch list tools are also much more detailed. It offers 580 watch list fields, 374 technical indicators, 24 drawing tools, and features like chart notes, historical trades, corporate events, custom date ranges, automated chart pattern analysis, multiple saved chart profiles, and custom studies. Public.com, by comparison, offers just 3 watch list fields, 15 technical indicators, and no drawing tools or advanced chart features, making it a much simpler platform for basic investing.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Web Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No |
| Desktop Platform (Mac) | Yes | No |
| Paper Trading | Yes | No |
| Watchlists - Total Fields | 580 | 3 |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies | 374 | 15 |
| Charting - Drawing Tools | 24 | 0 |
| Advanced Trading |
|
|
Dive deeper: Best Brokerage Accounts and Online Stock Brokers for 2026, Best Paper Trading Apps and Simulators for 2026
Both Charles Schwab and Public.com provide beginner-friendly investor education on stocks, ETFs, options, and bonds, plus on-demand videos and live webinars. The key differences are in depth and practice tools: Schwab also teaches mutual funds, includes paper trading so you can practice without risking money, and offers quizzes and progress tracking to help you learn step by step. Public.com does not offer mutual fund education, paper trading, quizzes, or learning progress tracking.
For quality, Schwab earns 5 stars for education and is ranked #2 out of 14 brokers by StockBrokers.com, while Public.com earns 3.5 stars and ranks #8. If you want structured lessons, practice tools, and a clear path to build skills, Schwab is the stronger fit. If you just need accessible guides, videos, and webinars within a simple app, Public.com can cover the basics for new investors.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Education (Stocks) | Yes | Yes |
| Education (ETFs) | Yes | Yes |
| Education (Options) | Yes | Yes |
| Education (Mutual Funds) | Yes | No |
| Education (Fixed Income) | Yes | Yes |
| Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Webinars | Yes | Yes |
| Education |
|
|
Dive deeper: Best Trading Platforms for Beginners in 2026
Charles Schwab is the stronger pick for stock trading apps if you want a more complete mobile experience. It ranks #1 out of 14 brokers from StockBrokers.com and earns 5 stars, while Public.com ranks #13 and gets 3 stars. Both brokers offer iPhone and Android apps, stock alerts, custom watch lists, watch list column customization, after-hours charting, mobile options trading, and stock comparison tools on charts, but Schwab offers more for active traders and research-focused users.
Where Charles Schwab pulls ahead most is in market data and charting. Its mobile app includes streaming quotes, streaming live TV, videos on demand, landscape chart viewing, after-hours stock trading, and 373 technical studies. Public.com does not offer streaming quotes, live TV, or videos on demand, and it offers no technical studies in its mobile charting tools. Public.com also does not support landscape chart viewing, which may matter if you prefer a wider chart layout on your phone.
For basic mobile trading, Public.com still covers the essentials well, especially if you mainly want a simple app for buying and selling stocks and keeping track of your watch lists. It also supports both iPhone and Android devices, just like Schwab, though neither broker offers an Apple Watch app. Overall, Charles Schwab is the better choice for traders who want deeper app features, while Public.com may appeal more to users who prefer a simpler platform.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| iPhone App | Yes | Yes |
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple Watch App | No | No |
| Stock Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Charting - After-Hours | Yes | Yes |
| Charting - Technical Studies | 373 | 0 |
| Mobile Trading Apps |
|
|
Dive deeper: Best Stock Trading Apps of 2026
Charles Schwab and Public.com both keep some core investing costs low, since neither broker requires a minimum deposit and both charge $0 for regular stock trades. The biggest difference shows up in options trading and account-related charges: Schwab charges $0.65 per options contract, while Public.com charges $0.00. Public.com also has lower margin rates across the balance ranges listed, but Schwab is the cheaper choice for IRA closure fees and account transfers. Overall, if you want the lower day-to-day trading cost, Public.com has the edge on options and margin, while Charles Schwab is better on transfer fees and certain retirement account charges.
When it comes to options trading, Charles Schwab charges $0.65 per contract, while Public.com charges nothing per contract. Both brokers charge $0 for options exercise and assignment fees, so those costs are the same. For margin borrowing, Schwab charges 11.825% for balances below $25,000, 11.325% for balances from $25,000 to $49,999, and 10.375% for balances from $50,000 to $99,999. Public.com’s margin rates are lower in each of those tiers, at 4.90%, 4.90%, and 4.75% respectively.
On account fees, both Charles Schwab and Public.com have a $0 minimum deposit and $0 IRA annual fee. Schwab also charges $0 for IRA closure fees, while Public.com charges $150. For transfers, Schwab charges $0 for partial ACAT transfers and $50 for full transfers, compared with Public.com’s $100 fee for both partial and full ACAT transfers. If you are looking for the lowest all-around fees, Schwab tends to win on account transfer and IRA closure costs, while Public.com is the cheaper pick for options and margin borrowing.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Stock Trades | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Options (Per Contract) | $0.65 | $0.00 |
| Options Exercise Fee | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Options Assignment Fee | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| IRA Annual Fee | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| IRA Closure Fee | $0.00 | $150.00 |
Dive deeper: Best Free Stock Trading Platforms and Commission-Free Apps for 2026
When comparing Charles Schwab and Public.com for day trading, Charles Schwab stands out with a comprehensive suite of features that cater to active traders. Schwab offers streaming time and sales for stocks, streaming live TV, direct market routing, and ladder trading, all crucial tools for serious day traders. Additionally, users can benefit from trading hotkeys for quick keyboard entry and access to level 2 quotes, which provide deeper insights into stock prices. Charles Schwab also supports both basic and advanced strategy backtesting, allowing traders to simulate strategies against historical data for more informed decision-making. The inclusion of a short locator tool offers real-time availability of shares for short-selling, enhancing the platform's appeal for those involved in more complex trading tactics. However, it's noteworthy that neither platform offers order liquidity rebates.
In contrast, Public.com provides a more simplified offering that might appeal to casual investors rather than those needing sophisticated trading tools. The absence of features like streaming time and sales, live TV, direct market routing, ladder trading, and trading hotkeys means that Public.com might not serve the needs of traders seeking immediate and precise trading execution. For those who prioritize access to level 2 quotes or want to test their trading strategies through backtesting, Public.com may not be ideal. Furthermore, without a short locator tool, traders who utilize short-selling strategies may find themselves at a disadvantage. Thus, for day traders requiring a variety of advanced features to maximize their trading efficiency and insights, Charles Schwab emerges as a more equipped choice compared to Public.com.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Streaming Time & Sales | Yes | No |
| Streaming TV | Yes | No |
| Direct Market Routing - Equities | Yes | No |
| Level 2 Quotes - Stocks | Yes | No |
| Trade Ideas - Backtesting | Yes | No |
| Trade Ideas - Backtesting Adv | Yes | No |
| Short Locator | Yes | No |
Dive deeper: Best Day Trading Platforms and Apps for 2026
For market research, Charles Schwab is the stronger choice overall. It offers more ways to dig into investments, more screening tools, downloadable PDF reports, and better research coverage across stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, and bonds. Public.com still gives everyday investors basic research tools for stocks, ETFs, OTC names, and bonds, but it leaves out several features that more active researchers may want, such as mutual fund research, ESG research, social sentiment data, and downloadable stock or ETF reports.
Charles Schwab offers stock, ETF, mutual fund, pink sheets/OTCBB, and bond research, while Public.com covers stock, ETF, pink sheets/OTCBB, and bond research only. Schwab also lets users view portfolio allocation by asset class and includes stock research based on social media sentiment data, which Public.com does not. In addition, Schwab provides seven downloadable PDF stock research reports and downloadable ETF reports, while Public.com does not offer PDF research reports for stocks or ETFs.
For trade ideas, Charles Schwab has stock, ETF, mutual fund, and bond screeners, giving investors more ways to filter and compare opportunities. Public.com does not offer these screeners. That gap shows up in third-party ratings as well: Charles Schwab earns 4.5 out of 5 stars for market research and ranks #2 out of 14 brokers at StockBrokers.com, while Public.com scores 2.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #12 out of 14.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Research - Stocks | Yes | Yes |
| Screener - Stocks | Yes | No |
| Research - ETFs | Yes | Yes |
| Screener - ETFs | Yes | No |
| Research - Mutual Funds | Yes | No |
| Screener - Mutual Funds | Yes | No |
| Research - Fixed Income | Yes | Yes |
| Screener - Fixed Income | Yes | No |
| Research |
|
|
When comparing the banking capabilities of online brokers Charles Schwab and Public.com, Schwab provides a much broader range of services. Charles Schwab offers checking and savings accounts, catering to those looking for traditional banking options alongside investing. Additionally, Schwab supplies customers with debit and credit cards, adding more convenience for everyday transactions. Moreover, Schwab includes mortgage loans and certificate of deposits (CDs) in their offerings, giving users an opportunity to diversify their financial strategy. In contrast, Public.com focuses solely on investment services and doesn't offer banking features like checking or savings accounts, debit or credit cards, mortgage loans, or CDs. Therefore, for users seeking comprehensive banking and investment services from one platform, Charles Schwab presents a more complete solution, while Public.com remains a choice for investment-only purposes.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Checking Accounts | Yes | No |
| Savings Accounts | Yes | No |
| Debit Cards | Yes | No |
| Credit Cards | Yes | No |
| Mortgage Loans | Yes | No |
| Brokerage CDs | Yes | No |
Dive deeper: Best Brokerage Accounts with Checking: Top Bank Brokers
After opening live accounts and testing 14 of the best online brokers, our research and live account testing finds that Charles Schwab is better than Public.com. Charles Schwab finished with an overall score of 93.3%, while Public.com finished with a score of 56.0%.
For most investors, the search for a great broker ends with Charles Schwab. Retaining the #1 Overall ranking in 2026, Schwab continues to set the industry standard. The broker uniquely balances scale with sophistication, offering both simplified mobile tools and the professional-grade thinkorswim platform. From buying a first fractional share to managing a multimillion-dollar estate, Schwab provides a platform tailored to every need, serving as the definitive operating system for modern wealth.
Charles Schwab and Public.com both offer crypto trading, but Public.com provides a much broader selection with 66 coins compared to Charles Schwab’s 2. If variety matters, Public.com is the stronger choice for crypto investors, while Charles Schwab offers a more limited crypto lineup.
Dive deeper: Best Online Brokers for Crypto Trading in 2026
Both Charles Schwab and Public.com offer Traditional and Roth IRA accounts with a $0 annual fee. Charles Schwab charges $0 to close an IRA, while Public.com charges a $150 IRA closure fee, making Schwab the more cost-effective option.
Dive deeper: Best IRA Accounts for 2026
Find the best crypto trading platform for 2026. We rank eToro, Fidelity, Interactive Brokers, Webull, and Robinhood on fees, security, and coin selection.
Steven Hatzakis May 27, 2026
Find the best brokerage for high-net-worth investors. Compare Fidelity, Schwab, Merrill, and more for premium services and tailored investment tools.
Jessica Inskip January 27, 2026
We tested the 5 best futures trading platforms of 2026. IBKR wins overall, and TradeStation has the lowest day-trade margins we found. Compare commissions, margins, and micros.
Jessica Inskip October 05, 2026
Find the best rollover IRA accounts. Compare Fidelity, Schwab, and E*TRADE for easy transfers, low fees, and smart retirement investing tools.
Andrea Coombes October 28, 2026
We tested 14 brokers with real accounts. See the best options trading platforms for beginners, low fees and advanced traders, with contract fees compared.
Jessica Inskip September 09, 2026
The best brokerage accounts of 2026, tested by our team. Compare Schwab, Fidelity, Interactive Brokers, E*TRADE and more online stock brokers on fees, platforms and research.
Jessica Inskip August 06, 2026
The best brokerage accounts with checking and the best banks for investing in 2026. Merrill Edge, J.P. Morgan, Ally, Fidelity and E*TRADE compared on cash management, debit cards, rewards and investing tools.
Jessica Inskip April 16, 2026
Explore the best international brokers for U.S. investors. Compare Interactive Brokers, Charles Schwab, and Fidelity for global stock trading access.
Jessica Inskip May 22, 2026
Fidelity, E*TRADE, and Schwab top our 2026 list of trading platforms and apps for beginners, with $0 minimums, $0 stock trades, and built-in education.
Jessica Inskip October 15, 2026
Find the best IRA accounts. Compare Fidelity, Schwab, Merrill Edge, E*TRADE, & J.P. Morgan for retirement planning, fees, tools, and account flexibility.
Jessica Inskip March 31, 2026
The best free stock trading platforms and commission-free apps for 2026. Interactive Brokers, Fidelity, Ally, J.P. Morgan and E*TRADE tested on the true cost of $0 trades, hidden fees and how free brokers make money.
Jessica Inskip September 02, 2026
Find top U.S. forex brokers. From tastyfx to OANDA, explore platforms with strong regulation, great tools, and user-friendly trading.
Steven Hatzakis May 29, 2026
Find the best penny stock brokers. Compare Fidelity, Firstrade, Schwab, E*TRADE, and TradeStation for OTC access, fees, and tools.
Jessica Inskip August 02, 2026
Discover the best brokers for trade execution. Compare Fidelity, Interactive Brokers, and more for price improvement, speed, and transparency.
Jessica Inskip October 12, 2026
The best day trading platforms and apps for 2026. Interactive Brokers, Schwab thinkorswim, Fidelity, E*TRADE and TradeStation tested on execution speed, Level 2 data, hotkeys, margin rates and the pattern day trader rule.
Jessica Inskip October 05, 2026
Practice trading risk-free with the best paper trading apps and simulators of 2026. Compare Webull, Schwab thinkorswim, Interactive Brokers, E*TRADE and TradeStation, plus how paper trading works.
Jessica Inskip July 24, 2026
Find the best Roth IRA accounts. Fidelity, Schwab, and E*TRADE lead with low fees, smart investing tools, and retirement planning support.
Andrea Coombes October 28, 2026
Our eToro review rates the social investing platform 3.0/5. Stock and ETF trades cost $0, crypto trades carry a 1% fee, and the minimum deposit is $50.
Jessica Inskip September 25, 2026
Fidelity charges $0 stock and ETF trades and won #1 for Research and Education in 2026. See our tested review of its fees, platforms, IRAs, and apps.
Jessica Inskip September 30, 2026
Read our Public.com review to learn how its intuitive platform and community-driven features help simplify investing for first-time traders.
Jessica Inskip September 18, 2026
Ally Invest scores 3/5 in our 2026 review. See how its $0 stock trades, $0.50 options, strong fixed income tools, and Ally Bank integration stack up.
Jessica Inskip September 14, 2026
Read our TradeStation review and discover why its pro-level tools, deep customization, and options focus make it a top choice for active traders.
Jessica Inskip October 07, 2026
Read our Merrill Edge Self-Directed review and see how it combines powerful investing tools, robust research, and integrated banking benefits.
Jessica Inskip September 29, 2026
Read our Charles Schwab review to learn why its platforms, research, and investor resources make it one of the top-ranked brokerages.
Jessica Inskip September 30, 2026
Read our Firstrade review and see why it’s a top choice for options traders, offering $0 contract fees, robust tools, and a growing feature set.
Jessica Inskip May 04, 2026
Our Robinhood review tests $0 stock and options trades, #1-ranked prediction markets, and AI agent trading, plus where its website research falls short.
Jessica Inskip October 01, 2026
Read our tastytrade review and discover why it’s the top choice for options traders, with low fees, advanced tools, and a seamless platform.
Jessica Inskip October 27, 2026
Read our Webull review and discover its commission-free trading, sleek platforms, paper trading tools, and fractional shares.
Jessica Inskip October 20, 2026
Read our 2026 E*TRADE review to see how powerful research, versatile platforms, and diverse investments make it a top choice for all investors.
Jessica Inskip September 29, 2026
Read our J.P. Morgan Self-Directed Investing review and discover its strengths in research, planning tools, and integration for Chase clients.
Jessica Inskip May 15, 2026
Read our Interactive Brokers review and see why it's a top choice for active traders with low costs, cutting-edge platforms, and global reach.
Jessica Inskip July 31, 2026Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Advanced Trading |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading Apps |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Customer Service |
| N/A | |
| Education |
|
| |
| Ease of Use |
|
| |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Charles Schwab Review | Public.com Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
| Trading Fees | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| Stock Trades | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| Penny Stock Fees (OTC) | $6.950 | $2.990 | |
| Mutual Fund Trade Fee | Varies | n/a | |
| Options (Per Contract) | $0.65 | $0.00 | |
| Futures (Per Contract) | $2.25 | (Not offered) | |
| Broker Assisted Trade Fee | $25 | n/a |
| Margin Rates | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margin Rate Under $25,000 | 11.825% | 4.90% | |
| Margin Rate $25,000 to $49,999.99 | 11.325% | 4.90% | |
| Margin Rate $50,000 to $99,999.99 | 10.375% | 4.75% | |
| Margin Rate $100,000 to $249,999.99 | 10.325% | 4.50% | |
| Margin Rate $250,000 to $499,999.99 | 10.075% | 4.50% | |
| Margin Rate $500,000 to $999,999.99 | Varies | 4.50% | |
| Margin Rate Above $1,000,000 | Varies | 4.25% |
| Account Fees | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IRA Annual Fee | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| IRA Closure Fee | $0.00 | $150.00 | |
| Account Transfer Out (Partial) | $0.00 | $100.00 | |
| Account Transfer Out (Full) | $50.00 | $100.00 | |
| Options Exercise Fee | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| Options Assignment Fee | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Investment Options | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Trading | Yes | Yes | |
| Account Feature - Margin Trading | Yes | Yes | |
| Fractional Shares (Stocks) | Yes | Yes | |
| OTC Stocks | Yes | No | |
| Options Trading | Yes | Yes | |
| Complex Options Max Legs | 4 | 4 | |
| Futures Trading | Yes | No | |
| Forex Trading | Yes | No | |
| Crypto Trading | Yes | Yes | |
| Crypto Trading - Total Coins | 2 | 66 | |
| Fixed Income (Treasurys) | Yes | Yes | |
| Fixed Income (Corporate Bonds) | Yes | Yes | |
| Fixed Income (Municipal Bonds) | Yes | No | |
| Traditional IRAs | Yes | Yes | |
| Roth IRAs | Yes | Yes | |
| Advisor Services | Yes | No | |
| International Countries (Stocks) | 12 | 0 |
| Order Types | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Order Type - Market | Yes | Yes | |
| Order Type - Limit | Yes | Yes | |
| Order Type - After Hours | Yes | Yes | |
| Order Type - Stop | Yes | Yes | |
| Order Type - Trailing Stop | Yes | No | |
| Order Type - OCO | Yes | No | |
| Order Type - OTO | Yes | No | |
| Order Type - Broker Assisted | Yes | No |
| Beginners | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Education (Stocks) | Yes | Yes | |
| Education (ETFs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Education (Options) | Yes | Yes | |
| Education (Mutual Funds) | Yes | No | |
| Education (Fixed Income) | Yes | Yes | |
| Education (Retirement) | Yes | Yes | |
| Retirement Calculator | Yes | No | |
| Investor Dictionary | Yes | Yes | |
| Paper Trading | Yes | No | |
| Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Webinars | Yes | Yes | |
| Progress Tracking | Yes | No | |
| Interactive Learning - Quizzes | Yes | No |
| Stock Trading Apps | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| iPhone App | Yes | Yes | |
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple Watch App | No | No | |
| Trading - Stocks | Yes | Yes | |
| Trading - After-Hours | Yes | Yes | |
| Trading - Simple Options | Yes | Yes | |
| Trading - Complex Options | Yes | Yes | |
| Order Ticket RT Quotes | Yes | Yes | |
| Order Ticket SRT Quotes | Yes | No |
| Stock App Features | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile Research - Market Movers | Yes | Yes | |
| Stream Live TV | Yes | No | |
| Videos on Demand | Yes | No | |
| Stock Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Option Chains Viewable | Yes | Yes | |
| Watchlist (Real-time) | Yes | Yes | |
| Watchlist (Streaming) | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Watchlists - Create & Manage | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlists - Column Customization | Yes | Yes |
| Stock App Charting | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charting - After-Hours | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Can Turn Horizontally | Yes | No | |
| Charting - Multiple Time Frames | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Technical Studies | 373 | 0 | |
| Charting - Study Customizations | Yes | No | |
| Charting - Stock Comparisons | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Trading Platform | thinkorswim | n/a | |
| Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Mac) | Yes | No | |
| Web Trading Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Paper Trading | Yes | No | |
| Trade Journal | Yes | No | |
| Watchlists - Total Fields | 580 | 3 |
| Stock Chart Features | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charting - Adjust Trades on Chart | Yes | No | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies | 374 | 15 | |
| Charting - Drawing Tools | 24 | 0 | |
| Charting - Notes | Yes | No | |
| Charting - Historical Trades | Yes | No | |
| Charting - Corporate Events | Yes | No | |
| Charting - Custom Date Range | Yes | No | |
| Charting - Custom Time Bars | Yes | No | |
| Charting - Automated Analysis | Yes | No | |
| Charting - Save Profiles | Yes | No | |
| Trade Ideas - Technical Analysis | Yes | No | |
| Charting - Study Customizations | 35 | 0 | |
| Charting - Custom Studies | Yes | No |
| Day Trading | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Streaming Time & Sales | Yes | No | |
| Streaming TV | Yes | No | |
| Direct Market Routing - Equities | Yes | No | |
| Ladder Trading | Yes | No | |
| Trade Hot Keys | Yes | No | |
| Level 2 Quotes - Stocks | Yes | No | |
| Trade Ideas - Backtesting | Yes | No | |
| Trade Ideas - Backtesting Adv | Yes | No | |
| Short Locator | Yes | No | |
| Order Liquidity Rebates | No | No |
| Research Overview | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research - Stocks | Yes | Yes | |
| Research - ETFs | Yes | Yes | |
| Research - Mutual Funds | Yes | No | |
| Research - Pink Sheets / OTCBB | Yes | Yes | |
| Research - Fixed Income | Yes | Yes | |
| Screener - Stocks | Yes | No | |
| Screener - ETFs | Yes | No | |
| Screener - Mutual Funds | Yes | No | |
| Screener - Fixed Income | Yes | No | |
| Portfolio Asset Allocation | Yes | Yes |
| Stock Research | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Research - PDF Reports | 7 | 0 | |
| Stock Research - Earnings | Yes | Yes | |
| Stock Research - Insiders | Yes | No | |
| Stock Research - Social | Yes | No | |
| Stock Research - News | Yes | Yes | |
| Stock Research - ESG | Yes | No | |
| Stock Research - SEC Filings | Yes | No |
| ETF Research | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs - Investment Objective | Yes | Yes | |
| ETF Fund Facts - Inception Date | Yes | Yes | |
| ETF Fund Facts - Expense Ratio | Yes | Yes | |
| ETF Fund Facts - Total Assets | Yes | Yes | |
| ETF Fund Facts - Total Holdings | Yes | Yes | |
| ETFs - Top 10 Holdings | Yes | Yes | |
| ETFs - Sector Exposure | Yes | No | |
| ETFs - Risk Analysis | Yes | No | |
| ETFs - Ratings | Yes | No | |
| ETFs - Morningstar StyleMap | Yes | No | |
| ETFs - PDF Reports | Yes | No |
| Mutual Fund Research | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mutual Funds - Investment Objective | Yes | No | |
| Mutual Funds - Performance Chart | Yes | No | |
| Mutual Funds - Performance Analysis | Yes | No | |
| Mutual Funds - Prospectus | Yes | No | |
| Mutual Funds - 3rd Party Ratings | Yes | No | |
| Mutual Funds - Fees Breakdown | Yes | No | |
| Mutual Funds - Top 10 Holdings | Yes | No | |
| Mutual Funds - Asset Allocation | Yes | No | |
| Mutual Funds - Sector Allocation | Yes | No | |
| Mutual Funds - Country Allocation | Yes | No | |
| Mutual Funds - StyleMap | Yes | No |
| Options Trading | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Option Chains - Total Greeks | 5 | 5 | |
| Option Analysis - P&L Charts | Yes | Yes |
| Banking | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank (Member FDIC) | Yes | No | |
| Checking Accounts | Yes | No | |
| Savings Accounts | Yes | No | |
| Credit Cards | Yes | No | |
| Debit Cards | Yes | No | |
| Mortgage Loans | Yes | No |
| Customer Service | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phone Support (Prospective Customers) | Yes | No | |
| Phone Support (Current Customers) | Yes | No | |
| Email Support | Yes | Yes | |
| Live Chat (Prospective Customers) | Yes | Yes | |
| Live Chat (Current Customers) | Yes | Yes | |
| 24/7 Support | Yes | No |
| Overall | Charles Schwab | Public.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Advanced Trading |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading Apps |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Ease of Use |
|
| |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Charles Schwab Review | Public.com Review |