menuclose
StockBrokers.com is committed to the highest ethical standards and reviews services independently. Learn how we make money.

Charles Schwab vs Robinhood 2026

Jessica Inskip

Written by Jessica Inskip
Director of Investor Research

Jeff Anberg

Edited by Jeff Anberg
Senior Editor

Blain Reinkensmeyer

Reviewed by Blain Reinkensmeyer
Managing Partner

June 17, 2026
  Fact Checked
close
Jessica Inskip Jessica Inskip
Director of Investor Research

Jessica Inskip is Director of Investor Research at StockBrokers.com, bringing 15 years of experience in brokerage and trading strategy. Jessica focuses on investor education and brokerage industry research.

stockbrokers-com-favicon.ico Why you can trust us

Led by Jessica Inskip, Director of Investor Research, the StockBrokers.com research team collects thousands of data points across hundreds of variables. We evaluate features important to every kind of investor, including beginners, casual investors, passive investors, and active traders. We carefully track data on margin rates, trading costs, and fees to rate stock brokers across our proprietary testing categories.

Our researchers open personal brokerage accounts and test all available platforms on desktop, web, and mobile for each broker reviewed on StockBrokers.com. Learn more about how we test.

Most people weighing Charles Schwab vs Robinhood are choosing between a full-service broker and a streamlined trading app. For the majority of investors, Schwab is the stronger pick. It wins on research, education, and range of investments, and it pairs all of that with a real bank. Robinhood is the better deal if you trade often and want to keep things simple. Options contracts are $0 there against $0.65 at Schwab, margin rates run far lower, and it's the only one of the two with crypto and prediction markets.

I've spent more than 15 years in retail brokerage, and I held both to the same hands-on standard. Examples of tests I run are building an identical multi-leg options spread on each, running the same stock screen on both, and working through each education library start to finish. Here is my in-depth rundown on these two brokers.

Charles Schwab vs Robinhood

Broker
Rating
"Best for"
Bullet Points
Overall Score
5.0/5
Best for most investors overall
  • Minimum Deposit: $0.00
  • Stock Trades: $0.00
  • Options (Per Contract): $0.65
Why we like it
Review

For most investors, the search for a great broker ends with Charles Schwab. Retaining the #1 Overall ranking in 2026, Schwab continues to set the industry standard. The broker uniquely balances scale with sophistication, offering both simplified mobile tools and the professional-grade thinkorswim platform. From buying a first fractional share to managing a multimillion-dollar estate, Schwab provides a platform tailored to every need, serving as the definitive operating system for modern wealth. Read full review

Pros
  • thinkorswim is the industry benchmark for professional-grade trading and charting.
  • Best in Class Research features actionable daily updates and deep fundamental data.
  • Top-tier education with webinars, videos, and courses.
Cons
  • No spot crypto trading (limited to ETFs and futures).
  • "Stock Slices" (fractional shares) are limited to S&P 500 companies.
  • Base margin rates are significantly higher than dedicated low-cost competitors.
Overall Score
3.5/5
Best for low-cost options, crypto, and mobile-first trading
  • Minimum Deposit: $0.00
  • Stock Trades: $0.00
  • Options (Per Contract): $0.00 info
Why we like it
Review

Robinhood is best known for its commission-free trading, modern mobile and desktop platforms, and low-cost access to options, margin, and futures trading. Read full review

Pros
  • Robinhood Legend offers 90+ technical indicators.
  • 3% IRA match on contributions.
  • The Investor's Guild explains complex topics.
  • Futures trading and 24-hour trading.
Cons
  • No economic calendars, sector heat maps, or Treasury yield curves.
  • No deep fundamental research.
  • Legend lacks critical tools.
  • No mutual funds, individual bonds, custodial or trust accounts.

Robinhood vs Charles Schwab at a glance

Our side-by-side evaluation found a lopsided scorecard with a few decisive exceptions. Charles Schwab wins most of the categories we test, from research to mobile to education. Robinhood answers on price and on a handful of modern products Schwab doesn't carry. The table below shows where each one lands.

Feature Charles Schwab logoCharles Schwab
Robinhood logoRobinhood
Overall 5/5 Stars 3.5/5 Stars
Mobile Trading Apps 5/5 Stars 4/5 Stars
Advanced Trading 4.5/5 Stars 3/5 Stars
Minimum Deposit $0.00 $0.00
Stock Trades $0.00 $0.00
Options (Per Contract) $0.65 $0.00
Futures Trading Yes Yes
Crypto Trading No Yes

Top takeaways for Charles Schwab in 2026

  • The research is the best I've tested, anchored by an equity ratings report that pairs Schwab's own call with the reasoning behind several third-party firms.
  • The product range runs from stocks to a full bond desk to futures, and it sits next to checking, savings, and CDs under one login.
  • thinkorswim is a serious active-trader platform, with 374 charting studies, backtesting, and paper trading that Robinhood can't match.
  • Education is deep and well-built, with eight multi-hour courses and around 30 live webcasts a week through Schwab Coaching.
  • Costs are fair but not the lowest. Options run $0.65 per contract, and margin starts above 12% for smaller balances.

Top takeaways for Robinhood in 2026

  • It's one of the cheapest places I've tested to trade options. Contracts, exercise, and assignment are all $0.
  • Margin is far cheaper, starting at 5.75% on balances under $25,000 against Schwab's 12.58%.
  • Robinhood reaches markets Schwab doesn't, including 22 cryptocurrencies, prediction markets, and IPO access.
  • Robinhood Legend is the easiest charting platform I've used, and it can auto-invest on a recurring schedule in both stocks and ETFs.
  • Mind the gaps: no mutual funds, no bonds, no accounts for kids or businesses, and a $100 transfer-out fee.

Robinhood vs Charles Schwab: fees and commissions

Stock and ETF trades are free at both brokers, so the real comparison lives in options contracts, margin rates, and the fees you only meet at the edges. We verified every line below against each broker's current pricing.

Feature Charles Schwab logoCharles Schwab
Robinhood logoRobinhood
Stock Trades $0.00 $0.00
Mutual Fund Trade Fee Varies N/A
Options (Per Contract) $0.65 $0.00
Options Exercise Fee $0.00 $0.00
Options Assignment Fee $0.00 $0.00
Futures (Per Contract) $2.25 $0.75
Broker Assisted Trade Fee $25 N/A
Margin Rate Under $25,000 12.58% 5.75%
Bond Trade Fee $1 per bond ($10 min/$250 max) N/A
IRA Annual Fee $0.00 $0.00
Account Transfer Out (Full) $50.00 $100.00

Where Robinhood wins on cost

Robinhood is cheaper almost everywhere a frequent trader actually pays. Options contracts are $0 with no exercise or assignment fees, which adds up fast if you trade spreads every week the way I do. The margin gap is the bigger story. Robinhood lends at 5.75% on balances under $25,000, where Schwab starts at 12.58%. Futures are cheaper too, and there's no surcharge on over-the-counter stocks, which Schwab prices at $6.95.

Where Charles Schwab wins on cost

Schwab wins on the fees around ownership rather than trading. A partial transfer out is free and a full one runs $50, against a flat $100 at Robinhood. More to the point, the same $0 stock commission buys access to things Robinhood doesn't sell at any price: Treasuries, thousands of bonds at $1 each, and no-transaction-fee mutual funds. You're paying nothing to reach a much wider range of assets.

Verdict

Best for active options and margin traders: Robinhood.

Best for low-cost access to a wide product set: Charles Schwab.

If your costs come from trading, Robinhood is plainly cheaper. If they come from owning bonds, funds, and Treasuries, Schwab gets you there for less because Robinhood can't get you there at all.

Charles Schwab vs Robinhood: range of investments

What separates these two is sheer selection. Schwab carries nearly every asset class a U.S. investor can buy, while Robinhood runs a leaner catalog that highlights newer products. One wants to be the only account you ever open. The other is happy being the one you trade in.

Feature Charles Schwab logoCharles Schwab
Robinhood logoRobinhood
Options Trading Yes Yes
Fractional Shares (Stocks) Yes Yes
Fractional Shares (ETFs) No Yes
Mutual Funds Yes No
Fixed Income (Treasurys) Yes No
Fixed Income (Corporate Bonds) Yes No
Fixed Income (Municipal Bonds) Yes No
Crypto Trading No Yes
Crypto Trading - Total Coins 0 22
Futures Trading Yes Yes
Futures Options Yes No
Forex Trading Yes No
Prediction markets No Yes
IPO Access No Yes
Order Type - After Hours Yes Yes
Order Type - 24 hr Extended Yes Yes
Order Type - Broker Assisted Yes No

Where Charles Schwab wins

Schwab has a wider selection, and the gap is enormous. Mutual funds, individual bonds by the thousand, and forex through thinkorswim all live at Schwab, and not one of them exists at Robinhood. Schwab trades across 12 international markets where Robinhood reaches a single one. The account side tells the same story. You can open a 529, a custodial account, a trust, a business account, or a small-business retirement plan at Schwab, and Robinhood opens none of them.

Where Robinhood wins

Robinhood provides newer products and everyday automation. Robinhood lists 22 cryptocurrencies, runs prediction markets, and hands out IPO access that Schwab doesn't offer. Crypto is the headline gap, and it's about to narrow. Schwab is expected to launch its own crypto trading this year, though only spot bitcoin and ethereum, and at a 0.75% fee on the dollar value of each trade. Robinhood also nails the small stuff long-term investors lean on. It runs recurring buys in stocks and ETFs and sells fractional shares of ETFs, not only stocks. Schwab offers fractional stocks through Stock Slices but won't slice an ETF.

Verdict

Best for the widest selection in a single account: Charles Schwab.

Best for crypto, prediction markets, and automated investing: Robinhood.

The catch with Robinhood is everything it leaves out. No mutual funds, no bonds, and no accounts for kids, trusts, or businesses. If none of that is on your list, the omissions won't cost you a thing.

Feature Charles Schwab logoCharles Schwab
Robinhood logoRobinhood
Range of Investments 4.5/5 Stars 4/5 Stars

Featured Offers


Robinhood vs Charles Schwab: mobile apps

Both of these rank among the better brokerage apps I've tested, and they're good at almost opposite things. Robinhood's app is built around speed and charting. Schwab ships two apps, a polished flagship and a separate thinkorswim app for active traders. Our evaluation compared both on charting, market data, and order entry.

Feature Charles Schwab logoCharles Schwab
Robinhood logoRobinhood
iPhone App Yes Yes
Android App Yes Yes
Apple Watch App Yes Yes
Stock Alerts Yes Yes
Mobile Watchlists - Column Customization Yes Yes
Mobile Watchlists - Create & Manage Yes Yes
Mobile Watchlists - Column Filtering Yes Yes

Where Robinhood's app wins

Mobile charting this strong is rare. Whatever I set up in Legend carries over to the phone on its own, which saves me when I'm walking into a segment with no desktop nearby. The options chain has come a long way too, now showing the Greeks and implied volatility while the underlying price stays pinned to the top as I move through strikes. It also automates recurring buys, which Schwab's app still won't do.

Single-legged options chain

Robinhood’s mobile options chain features a clean, simplified layout, with percent breakeven shown by default for each contract. While this may appeal to short-term traders, it lacks key metrics, like the Greeks or probability of profit, that serious options traders often rely on. It’s a sleek experience, but one that leans more toward speculation than in-depth strategy analysis.

Where Charles Schwab's app wins

Schwab's app is best for overall market awareness and range. From Schwab's flagship app I can read sector heat maps, Treasury yields, and a daily Schwab Market Update podcast that tells me what moved and why before the open. Active traders get a second, dedicated thinkorswim app with full chains and chat rooms. That two-app approach is exactly why Schwab earned our top mobile honors this year.

Schwab thinkorswim mobile screenshot cash secured put

Schwab’s thinkorswim options trade ticket on mobile features a trade calculator view with both a P/L diagram and detailed table analysis. In this example, a 30-day-to-expiration at-the-money (ATM) cash-secured put on AAPL is displayed, clearly showing limited profit potential capped at the premium received—regardless of how high the stock rises. The payoff diagram also illustrates the increasing downside risk, mirroring the risk profile of stock ownership and highlighting the neutral to bullish bias of this strategy.

Verdict

Best for a clean, mobile-first experience: Robinhood.

Best for market depth and active trading on the go: Charles Schwab.

One caution for options traders: neither flagship app is where I'd build a multi-leg spread. Schwab's flagship limits you to single legs, so you'd switch to its thinkorswim app, and Robinhood hides the per-leg detail I need.

Feature Charles Schwab logoCharles Schwab
Robinhood logoRobinhood
Mobile Trading Apps 5/5 Stars 4/5 Stars

Charles Schwab vs Robinhood: trading platforms and tools

Schwab gives you three venues: the website, the thinkorswim desktop platform, and a thinkorswim mobile app. Robinhood gives you its website plus Robinhood Legend, a browser-based active-trader platform, with no desktop software. The feature gap is wide. Robinhood has no paper trading, no backtesting, no conditional orders, and no short selling.

Feature Charles Schwab logoCharles Schwab
Robinhood logoRobinhood
Active Trading Platform thinkorswim Robinhood Legend
Desktop Trading Platform Yes No
Web Trading Platform Yes Yes
Desktop Platform (Mac) Yes No
Paper Trading Yes No
Watchlists - Total Fields 580 34
Charting - Indicators / Studies 374 90
Charting - Drawing Tools 24 26
Charting - Adjust Trades on Chart Yes Yes
Charting - Custom Studies Yes No
Ladder Trading Yes Yes
Level 2 Quotes - Stocks Yes Yes
Trade Hot Keys Yes Yes
Trade Ticket - Margin Impact Yes Yes
Trade Ticket - Tax Lot Selection Yes Yes

Where Charles Schwab wins

Schwab's thinkorswim platform is simply one of the deepest advanced platforms available, and gives you some of the best options tools around. thinkorswim carries 374 charting studies to Legend's 90, plus backtesting and paper trading. Its options analytics are the differentiator: an earnings-analysis tool that shows price action and implied moves around past earnings, and options statistics that read order flow at the bid and ask. I'll be honest that neither platform puts net Greeks on the multi-leg ticket, a longtime gripe of mine, but everything around the Schwab chain runs deeper.

Desktop chart of U.S. unemployment rates alongside a live news feed and streaming headlines

This screenshot showcases a desktop chart of U.S. unemployment rates alongside a live news feed and streaming headlines, enabling traders to track macroeconomic trends in real time. Access to this level of economic insight helps investors connect data with market movement.

Where Robinhood wins

Robinhood is extremely approachable. Legend is the most enjoyable charting platform I've picked up in years, and I'm picky about charts. I had a custom layout running in a couple of minutes, my trend lines lock onto exact prices, and I can draw straight onto an oscillator, so my 80 and 20 lines sit right on RSI. thinkorswim is more capable, but the learning curve is steep. Legend asks almost nothing of you.

Robinhood Legend active trading platform

Robinhood Legend is arguably one of the best-looking active trading platforms on the market, with a sleek, modern interface that’s a pleasure to use. However, that clean design comes with trade-offs: some advanced tools and features are missing compared to more robust platforms. It’s a great experience for visual clarity and ease of use, but power traders may find themselves wanting more.

Verdict

Best for advanced, options, and active traders: Charles Schwab.

Best for chart-driven traders who value ease: Robinhood.

thinkorswim is the more powerful platform by a wide margin, and it earned our top desktop-platform honors. But if you're newer to active trading and want to actually enjoy the software, Legend is the friendlier place to learn.

Feature Charles Schwab logoCharles Schwab
Robinhood logoRobinhood
Advanced Trading 4.5/5 Stars 3/5 Stars

Robinhood vs Charles Schwab: research

No category separates these two more than research. Schwab runs one of the most complete research libraries I've tested, while Robinhood gives you two bright spots and a lot of empty shelves. We checked both brokers feature by feature below.

Feature Charles Schwab logoCharles Schwab
Robinhood logoRobinhood
Research - Stocks Yes Yes
Screener - Stocks Yes Yes
Research - ETFs Yes Yes
Screener - ETFs Yes No
Research - Mutual Funds Yes No
Screener - Mutual Funds Yes No
Research - Fixed Income Yes No
Screener - Fixed Income Yes No
Research - Pink Sheets / OTCBB Yes Yes
Options Chains - IV Yes Yes
Option Chains - Total Greeks 5 5
Strategy Net Greeks Yes No
Options - Strategy Builder No Yes

Where Charles Schwab wins

Schwab's equity ratings report is the standout, because it shows not just a rating but the reasoning behind several third-party firms and the date each call changed. The stock comparison tool lets me hold a company against its sector and the S&P 500 in one view, and I'll use it daily. The screeners filter on forward metrics like next-year P/E and revenue growth, which most brokers can't do.

Schwab

Schwab’s web-based stock screener stands out with advanced filtering tools that include forward-year P/E ratios, projected EPS growth, and revenue estimates—ideal for forward-looking investors. The platform allows users to screen for S&P 500 stocks based on future performance metrics, earnings surprises, and Schwab Analyst Ratings. Unlike many screeners that focus solely on historical data, Schwab helps investors identify high-potential opportunities based on forward projections.

Where Robinhood wins

Robinhood does an amazing job with its research commentary and context. The Investor's Guild, Robinhood's in-house publication, is a real pleasure to read. The pieces read like the market talk I get to have with sharp analysts through my work, the kind of conversation most retail investors never sit in on. Layer in the AI digests that explain why a stock just moved, and Robinhood hands you plain-language context better than most big brokers. Depth of data is the one thing it can't hand you.

Analyst ratings of AAPL

Robinhood’s research tools present analyst ratings in a clean, visually appealing format, shown here with the buy, hold, and sell breakdown for Apple. The platform also includes concise “bulls vs. bears” commentary, giving investors a quick snapshot of both sides of the debate. While this type of data is common across brokerages, Robinhood’s design makes it especially easy to digest at a glance.

Verdict

Best for serious research and screening: Charles Schwab.

Best for readable market context: Robinhood.

Robinhood has real gaps to its research offering. There's no economic calendar, no sector performance view, and the stock screener skips the filters I rely on. Searching for solid dividend payers, I had no way to screen on free cash flow or payout ratio.

Charles Schwab vs Robinhood: education

This one is closer than the star gap implies. Robinhood produces some of the clearest investing content anywhere. Its options material eases you into time decay and volatility before it ever piles on the Greeks, and it nicknames the four core strategies the four horsemen, a touch I find charming. Schwab's library, though, is larger and far better outfitted. It runs eight multi-hour courses with quizzes, roughly 30 live webcasts a week through Schwab Coaching, and the calculators and progress tracking Robinhood doesn't have at all. Schwab's video production is the best I've seen from any broker. The lone weakness is structure. Apart from the courses, Schwab's material isn't always ordered for learning, whereas Robinhood's flows logically from the very first click.

Feature Charles Schwab logoCharles Schwab
Robinhood logoRobinhood
Education (Stocks) Yes Yes
Education (ETFs) Yes Yes
Education (Options) Yes Yes
Education (Mutual Funds) Yes No
Education (Fixed Income) Yes Yes
Videos Yes Yes
Webinars Yes No

Verdict

Best for a structured program with live coaching: Charles Schwab.

Best for plain-English articles you'll actually finish: Robinhood.

If you want a curriculum, calculators, and a live human teaching you technical analysis, Schwab has no peer here. If you want to read one excellent article at a time on your phone, Robinhood's writing is the standard. Just know there are no courses, webinars, or calculators behind it.

Charles Schwab and Robinhood: accounts and banking

This is the cleanest split in the comparison. Schwab is a bank as well as a broker, with FDIC-insured checking and savings, CDs, mortgages, and a debit and credit card, all under the same login as your brokerage account. Robinhood has no FDIC banking, no checking or savings, and no CDs. It offers a debit card and a cash-back credit card, plus an IRA match that vests like an employer 401(k) match, which is a clever retirement incentive. Schwab also opens account types Robinhood doesn't touch, including trusts, business accounts, and the kind of complex retirement plans that matter to high-net-worth investors and small-business owners.

Verdict

Best for banking and investing under one roof: Charles Schwab.

Best for a simple brokerage with a rewarding card and IRA match: Robinhood.

Final thoughts: Robinhood vs Charles Schwab

For most investors, my answer is Schwab. It took our #1 Stock Research award this year, which lines up with how often I reach for its equity ratings report and comparison tool in my own work. The product range stretches from Treasuries to a small-business 401(k), thinkorswim treats active and options traders like adults, and the whole thing sits beside a real bank. If you're investing for the long term, saving for retirement, or you just want one account that does it all, that's where I'd send you. It won our #1 pick for best overall broker in our 2026 Annual Awards for these reasons.

Robinhood, though, owns a real piece of this matchup. It is commission-free for options, its margin is far lower, and it took our #1 Prediction Markets award this year. Throw in 22 cryptocurrencies and the most pleasant trading app I've touched, and the pitch sells itself. If you trade with one eye on cost, live on your phone, and want crypto in the mix, Robinhood is the one to choose.

Jessica's take

"It's very hard to top the charting on thinkorswim, but it isn't easy to use. Robinhood Legend is probably the easiest technical analysis platform out there. thinkorswim can do more, but the best platform is the one you'll actually use."

Jessica Inskip
Director of Investor Research

jessica_inskip_170.png

Overall verdict

Best for most investors: Charles Schwab.

Best for low-cost options, crypto, and mobile-first trading: Robinhood.

Feature Charles Schwab logoCharles Schwab
Robinhood logoRobinhood
Overall 5/5 Stars 3.5/5 Stars
Range of Investments 4.5/5 Stars 4/5 Stars
Mobile Trading Apps 5/5 Stars 4/5 Stars
Advanced Trading 4.5/5 Stars 3/5 Stars
Research 4.5/5 Stars 2.5/5 Stars
Education 5/5 Stars 3.5/5 Stars
Ease of Use 4.5/5 Stars 4/5 Stars

Frequently asked questions

Is Charles Schwab or Robinhood better for beginners?

Each one owns a piece of the beginner experience. Robinhood's app is simpler and its writing is easier to digest, so the opening weeks feel less intimidating. Schwab gives a beginner far more room to grow, with courses, live coaching, calculators, banking, and every account type you'll eventually want. For most newcomers I'd lean Schwab, unless a stripped-down app is what matters most.

Does Robinhood or Charles Schwab have lower fees?

Robinhood, in most of the ways traders pay. Options contracts are $0 versus $0.65 at Schwab, and margin starts at 5.75% against Schwab's 12.58%. Schwab answers on account-level costs, with a free partial transfer out where Robinhood charges $100, plus low-cost access to bonds and Treasuries Robinhood doesn't offer.

Is Charles Schwab or Robinhood better for options trading?

It depends on what you trade. For single-leg trades, Robinhood's $0 contracts and clean chain are hard to beat. For spreads and advanced strategies, Schwab wins on thinkorswim's analytics, and it lets you trade options spreads inside an IRA, which Robinhood doesn't support.

Does Robinhood or Charles Schwab offer crypto?

Right now, only Robinhood offers direct crypto trading, with 22 coins. Schwab doesn't sell cryptocurrency directly yet, though that's changing. It's expected to roll out spot bitcoin and ethereum this year at a 0.75% fee on each trade's dollar value. For everything outside crypto, Schwab still covers far more ground, including mutual funds, bonds, and forex.

Can I buy mutual funds or bonds at Robinhood?

No. Robinhood doesn't offer mutual funds or direct bond trading, so fixed income there only comes through ETFs. Schwab trades mutual funds and runs a deep bond desk, with tens of thousands of listings and free online Treasury trades.

Which has the better app, Robinhood or Charles Schwab?

Schwab earned our top mobile honors and offers a separate thinkorswim app for active traders, so it wins on depth and market data. Robinhood's app is simpler and more beautiful, and its charting is excellent. Pick Schwab for range, Robinhood for a clean mobile-first feel.

Our testing

Why you should trust us

Jessica Inskip is Director of Investor Research at StockBrokers.com, bringing 15 years of experience in brokerage and trading strategy. A former FINRA-licensed rep, she held Series 7, 63, 66, and 4 licenses. Jessica focuses on investor education and brokerage industry research, appears regularly on CNBC, Bloomberg, The Schwab Network, Fox Business, and Yahoo! Finance, and hosts the Market MakeHer podcast.

Blain Reinkensmeyer, co-founder of StockBrokers.com, has been investing and trading for over 25 years. After having placed over 2,000 trades in his late teens and early 20s, he became one of the first in digital media to review online brokerages. Today, Blain is widely respected as a leading expert on finance and investing, specifically the U.S. online brokerage industry. Blain has been quoted in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, and Fast Company, among others. Blain created the original scoring rubrics for StockBrokers.com and oversees all testing and rating methodologies.

How we tested

  • We used our own brokerage accounts for testing.
  • We collected thousands of data points across the brokers we review.
  • We tested each online broker's website, desktop platforms, and mobile app, where applicable.
  • We maintained strict editorial independence; brokers cannot pay for inclusion or a higher rating.

Our research team meticulously collected data on every feature of importance to a wide range of customer profiles, including beginners, casual investors, passive investors, and active traders. We carefully track variables like margin rates, trading costs, fees, and platform features and use them to help rate brokers across a range of categories measuring ease of use, range of investments, research, education, and more.

At StockBrokers.com, our reviewers use a variety of computing devices to evaluate platforms and tools. Our reviews and data collection were conducted using the following devices chosen to reflect the everyday hardware our readers are likely to be using rather than top-tier configurations: iPhone SE running the latest iOS version, MacBook Pro M1 with 8 GB RAM running the current MacOS, and a Dell Vostro 5402 laptop i5 with 8 GB RAM running Windows 11 Pro.

Each broker was evaluated and scored on over 200 different variables across seven key categories: Range of Investments, Platforms & Tools, Research, Mobile Trading, Education, Ease of Use, and Overall. Learn more about how we test.

Trading platforms tested

We tested 14 online trading platforms for this guide:

Read next

Popular trading guides

More trading guides

Popular broker reviews

About the Editorial Team

Jessica Inskip

Jessica Inskip is Director of Investor Research at StockBrokers.com, bringing 15 years of experience in brokerage and trading strategy. A former FINRA-licensed rep, she held Series 7, 63, 66, and 4 licenses. Jessica focuses on investor education and brokerage industry research, appears regularly on CNBC, Fox Business, and Bloomberg, and hosts the Market MakeHer podcast.

Jeff Anberg

Jeff Anberg is a Senior Editor at StockBrokers.com. Along with years of experience in media distribution at a global newsroom, Jeff has a versatile knowledge base encompassing the technology and financial markets. He is a long-time active investor and engages in research on emerging markets like cryptocurrency. Jeff holds a Bachelor’s Degree in English Literature with a minor in Philosophy from San Francisco State University.

Blain Reinkensmeyer

Blain Reinkensmeyer has 20 years of trading experience with over 2,500 trades placed during that time. He heads research for all U.S.-based brokerages on StockBrokers.com and is respected by executives as the leading expert covering the online broker industry. Blain’s insights have been featured in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Forbes, and the Chicago Tribune, among other media outlets.

close